Nominations

Nominations, based on RONR, are very simple -- they take one person to make the nomination and no second. However, in real life it is not that simple. The habits and customs of an organization can change all that. In addition, the bylaws may add special conditions.

One of the changes that is common (often seen) is the need for a second. Yes, some organizations demand that nominations be seconded. What is fun is to look in the bylaws and see if a second is actually needed. Often, there is nothing in the bylaws that require a second or even recommend it. The need for a second is a myth that has become a fact for the members of the organization. Even if somebody informs them about the lack of a need for a second, they will claim that they need a second for any nomination.

Another is that there needs to be more than one candidate for an office. Now, some organizations do have that qualification in their bylaws but most do not. It came about because early in the history of the organization, two or more candidates was the norm. History has become imbedded and no matter how much people show it to not be a requirement, the majority of the organization (or a vocal minority) will insist that it is.

Is it worth fighting the organization about these? No, in my opinion. It is a lot of work that accomplishes nothing positive in the short run and none of us are really going to be around for the long run.